![]() It gives a slight bit of originality and ingeniousness to the franchise, but it's also illogical, extremely far-fetched and it might even be considered as being a little offensive. All of a sudden, this version comes up with a whole new historical background for Dracula He's portrayed like a real ladies-man and director Lussier even suggests that his wrath against humanity goes all the way back to the Biblical beginning I'm not quite sure what to think of this whole character-twist. Since Abraham used Dracula's blood to keep alive, the exact same powers are to find in her. The vacuum-closed coffin gets stolen and surprise surprise Dracula escapes .with a mission, because he's after Van Helsing's daughter in America. Abraham Van Helsing kept himself alive somehow and he still stands guard over the coffin that holds the remainders of Dracula. The year is 2000 and the location is Great Britain. Still not very good though, but I've seen greater disasters under the `Wes Craven Presents'-label⁗0 years after Bela Lugosi made him immortal, new blood is running through the veins of the horror icon Dracula (which is a pretty ironic statement to itself ). ![]() I've got to admit that it was a lot less awful than I expected. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |